Basketball News

PJ Tucker finds Sixers season ‘average’

Unlike Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Sixers will not seriously say that this elimination in the conference semi-finals is not a failure. Doc Rivers and his gang were well aware of the missed opportunity, especially in Game 6, and it was a gloomy PJ Tucker who addressed the press after the elimination.

With all of his 11 points in the first quarter, the veteran had yet tried to launch his team, punishing the impasses of Robert Williams and Boston.

“It was not enough”, he comments. “It just wasn’t enough. We weren’t tough enough. We weren’t physically and emotionally tough enough. It was not enough. »

A finding confirmed by Tobias Harris, his team’s top scorer, ahead of Joel Embiid and James Harden, with 19 points, despite an ugly 1/7 from afar.

“We lacked mental strength”confirms Tobias Harris. “When we were trailing by 6 or 8 points, it was difficult to create this type of energy, this rhythm that would have allowed us to come back and understand that the match was not too out of reach. Then they started making 3-pointers, quick field goals. The bullet losses also hurt us. We gave them too many easy baskets.

After this good first quarter, won 29-23 thanks to 11 points from PJ Tucker, the Sixers no doubt hoped to rely on James Harden and Joel Embiid to snatch this Game 7.

But while the two All-Stars have only scored 22 points in the last three quarters, at 5/20 shooting, for 4 assists and 7 loss of ball, while Jayson Tatum scored 40 points there ( on its 51), Philadelphia logically could not fight. To complete a season ” mean “in PJ Tucker’s own words.

P.J. Tucker Percentage Bounces
Season Crew GM Minimum Shots 3 points LF Off Def Early pd party Int bp CT Points
2006-07 TOR 17 5 50.0 0.0 57.1 0.7 0.7 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.8
2012-13 PHX 79 24 47.3 31.4 74.4 1.7 2.8 4.4 1.4 1.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 6.4
2013-14 PHX 81 31 43.1 38.7 77.6 2.0 4.5 6.5 1.7 2.5 1.4 1.3 0.3 9.4
2014-15 PHX 78 31 43.8 34.5 72.7 1.5 5.0 6.4 1.6 2.3 1.4 1.2 0.3 9.1
2015-16 PHX 82 31 41.1 33.0 74.6 2.0 4.2 6.2 2.2 2.5 1.3 1.4 0.2 8.0
2016-17* All Teams 81 28 41.3 35.7 77.4 1.4 4.4 5.8 1.2 2.4 1.4 0.8 0.2 6.7
2016-17* PHX 57 29 41.5 33.8 79.2 1.7 4.4 6.0 1.3 2.5 1.5 0.9 0.3 7.0
2016-17* TOR 24 25 40.6 40.0 68.8 1.0 4.4 5.4 1.1 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.2 5.8
2017-18 HOO 82 28 39.0 37.1 71.7 1.1 4.4 5.6 0.9 2.5 1.0 0.9 0.3 6.1
2018-19 HOO 82 34 39.6 37.7 69.5 1.5 4.4 5.8 1.2 3.1 1.6 0.8 0.5 7.3
2019-20 HOO 72 34 41.5 35.8 81.3 1.6 5.1 6.6 1.6 3.2 1.1 1.0 0.5 6.9
2020-21 * All Teams 52 26 37.3 33.6 75.0 1.0 2.9 3.9 1.2 2.4 0.8 0.8 0.4 3.7
2020-21 * HOO 32 30 36.6 31.4 78.3 1.0 3.6 4.6 1.4 2.8 0.9 1.0 0.6 4.4
2020-21 * MIL 20 20 39.1 39.4 60.0 0.9 1.9 2.8 0.8 1.7 0.5 0.4 0.1 2.6
2021-22 MIA 71 28 48.4 41.5 73.8 1.4 4.0 5.5 2.1 2.3 0.8 0.9 0.2 7.6
2022-23 PHL 75 26 42.7 39.3 82.6 1.3 2.7 3.9 0.8 2.4 0.5 0.6 0.2 3.6
Total 852 29 42.5 36.6 74.9 1.5 4.0 5.5 1.4 2.5 1.1 1.0 0.3 6.8

How to read the stats? MJ = matches played; Min = Minutes; Shots = Shots made / Shots attempted; 3pts = 3-points / 3-points attempted; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def= defensive rebound; Tot = Total bounces; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal fouls; Int = Intercepts; Bp = Lost bullets; Ct: Counters; Points = Points.

SEE ALSO:  Dillon Brooks will continue to "get into the heads of opponents"
Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please disable your ad blocker to be able to see the content of the page. For an independent site with free content, it is literally a matter of life and death to have ads. Thank you for your understanding!