If he brings a lot in defense, Dillon Brooks equally weighs down the Grizzlies in attack, especially at the moment in the playoffs because of his weak external address, but also his provocations which can disturb the group. Result, at Memphiswe could take advantage of him being a free agent to try to find a better job.
More in the news for his cuff in the crotch of LeBron James and his off-field statements than for his sports performance, the Canadian winger will more exactly be an unprotected “free agent”, and in the offices of the Grizzlies, we could go back to looking for a successor. Already, last February, the franchise had tried to recover Mikal Bridges or OG Anunoby.
” They offered four first draft rounds to the Nets to recover Mikal Bridges. They were in advanced discussions with the Raptors, but the latter were greedy on Draft picks to drop OG Anunoby indeed reminded Tim MacMahon ofESPN. ” They have already tried to part ways with Dillon Brooks. »
Solid outside defender but clearly less good attacker than other players of his profile on the same position, Dillon Brooks could therefore be pushed out by his team. Who would therefore find themselves faced with the obligation, in order not to weaken the collective ceiling of the team, to find better on the market.
Perhaps on the side of Toronto, once again, where major upheavals could punctuate the news of the Raptors after a failed season, paving the way for a potential transfer of OG Anunoby. On the side of Brooklyn, Mikal Bridges has established himself as the new boss of the Nets, when Cam Johnson is a priority of the “front office”. There remains the Dorian Finney-Smith track, certainly easier to obtain in a transfer… but it is not he who will necessarily do better on the 3/4 positions in attack.
” If they let Dillon Brooks go, they definitely need to find a very good defender winger sums up the ESPN journalist. ” Letting it go is one thing, replacing it is another. »
| Dillon Brooks | Percentage | Bounces | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Crew | GM | Minimum | Shots | 3 points | LF | Off | Def | Early | pd | party | Int | bp | CT | Points |
| 2017-18 | SAME | 82 | 29 | 44.0 | 35.6 | 74.7 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 11.0 |
| 2018-19 | SAME | 18 | 18 | 40.2 | 37.5 | 73.3 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 7.5 |
| 2019-20 | SAME | 73 | 29 | 40.7 | 35.8 | 80.8 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 16.2 |
| 2020-21 | SAME | 67 | 30 | 41.9 | 34.4 | 81.5 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 17.2 |
| 2021-22 | SAME | 32 | 28 | 43.2 | 30.9 | 84.9 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 18.4 |
| 2022-23 | SAME | 73 | 30 | 39.6 | 32.6 | 77.9 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 14.3 |
| Total | 345 | 29 | 41.6 | 34.2 | 79.5 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 14.5 | |
How to read the stats? MJ = matches played; Min = Minutes; Shots = Shots made / Shots attempted; 3pts = 3-points / 3-points attempted; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def= defensive rebound; Tot = Total bounces; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal fouls; Int = Intercepts; Bp = Lost bullets; Ct: Counters; Points = Points.
