
Since January 6, Bradley Beal was a replacement. But, as Mike Budenholzer says, after four defeats in a row, “You shouldn't lie, you had to win this meeting” in Chicago. The Suns coach therefore made the decision to put the back in the major five.
“We always try to search and try the best combinations, the best groups. We are looking, we test. We wanted to try, see what it would give and we had the feeling that it was our best chance ”,, justified The coach, who believes that his rear is “Really excellent for a while now”.
“He just told me that he had appreciated my way of managing things”says Bradley Beal, replacing for 15 games therefore, on the discussion with his trainer. “It was clearly not easy but I think of the coach too, because it is not easy to know where energy comes from and to set up combinations of players. »»
Tyus Jones sacrificed
Whoever paid the price for this choice is Tyus Jones, who for the first time started a meeting on the bench. “We try to straighten the bar, to find the solutions. The coach came to see me, said the news. I'm in “reacts positively the playmaker who did not score a single basket in this match, but delivered 6 assists without losing a ball in 20 minutes.
With 25 points at 10/19 in the shoot, 6 rebounds and 4 assists, the former leader of the Wizards took advantage of this opportunity. Better yet, his last basket, a 3-PTS 13 seconds from the end, definitively validated the long-awaited and necessary victory for the Suns.
“The key is that when I gave the ball to Devin Booker, he didn't wear the ball too much. He entered quickly, was able to set the defense. He had the opportunity to shoot, but came out the ball for Beal, which was huge ”describes Kevin during this decisive action of the “Big Three” of Arizona.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_anvrgdrk44
Bradley Beal | Percentage | Rebound | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Season | Team | MJ | Min | Shots | 3pts | Lf | Off | Def | Early | PD | Fte | Int | COP | Ct | Pts |
2012-13 | Wast | 56 | 31 | 41.0 | 38.6 | 78.6 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 13.9 |
2013-14 | Wast | 73 | 35 | 41.9 | 40.2 | 78.8 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 17.1 |
2014-15 | Wast | 63 | 34 | 42.7 | 40.9 | 78.3 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 15.3 |
2015-1 | Wast | 55 | 31 | 44.9 | 38.7 | 76.7 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 17.4 |
2016-17 | Wast | 77 | 35 | 48.2 | 40.4 | 82.5 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 23.1 |
2017-18 | Wast | 82 | 36 | 46.0 | 37.5 | 79.1 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 22.6 |
2018-19 | Wast | 82 | 37 | 47.5 | 35.1 | 80.8 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 25.6 |
2019-20 | Wast | 57 | 36 | 45.5 | 35.3 | 84.2 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 30.5 |
2020-21 | Wast | 60 | 36 | 48.5 | 34.9 | 88.9 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 0.4 | 31.3 |
2021-22 | Wast | 40 | 36 | 45.1 | 30.0 | 83.3 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 23.2 |
2022-23 | Wast | 50 | 34 | 50.6 | 36.5 | 84.2 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 23.2 |
2023-24 | PHX | 53 | 33 | 51.3 | 43.0 | 81.3 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 18.2 |
2024-25 | PHX | 38 | 32 | 49.7 | 39.7 | 81.6 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 17.4 |
Total | 786 | 35 | 46.4 | 37.6 | 82.2 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 21.6 |
How to read the stats? MJ = matches played; Min = minutes; Shots = successful shots / tempted shots; 3pts = 3-point / 3-point attempted; LF = Successful free throws / tempted free throws; Off = offensive rebound; Def = defensive rebound; Tot = Total rebounds; PD = assists; FTE: Personal faults; Int = interceptions; BP = lost bullets; CT: against; Pts = points.